Director: Bryan Fogel
Genre: Documentary
Runtime: 120
minutes
Year:
2017
Starring: Bryan Fogel, Grigory Rodchenkov,
Dave Zabrinskie, Don Catlin, Scott Brandt, Ben Stone, Richard Pound
Description: When Bryan
Fogel sets to uncover the truth about doping in sports, a chance meeting with a
Russian scientist transforms his story from a personal experiment into a
geopolitical thriller.
I WATCHED THIS MOVIE FOR MY 2021 MOVIE CHALLENGE.
WEEK 3: A DOCUMENTARY
Review: It is, of course, the dream of every documentary filmmaker, that
something happens during the production of your documentary that suddenly gives
you a truly remarkable story to tell. The Oscar-winning Netflix documentary “Icarus”
is the epitome of this type of documentary. Beginning as a story about an
amateur athlete who wants to find out through self-examination whether people
perform better because of doping, the entire tone of the documentary changes
when it suddenly finds itself at the heart of the biggest doping scandal in
sports history.
Bryan Fogel has been a top
amateur cyclist all his life. Just like many others he was a big fan of Lance
Armstrong and you feel immediately that this documentary is made from wanting
to understand the betrayal of Armstrong and others. Fogel was particularly
curious to investigate the influence of doping on sports performance, and
because he had just finished a surprisingly 14th place in the
toughest multi-day amateur cycling race in the world, the Haute Route, he
decided to try to finish even higher the following year with the use of doping.
The top 10 was incredibly good, and something in the documentary insinuates
that this could never have happened ‘cleanly’.
Because he wants to do it
all very neatly and safe, he decides to approach American anti-doping doctors,
as well as WADA (the worldwide anti-doping agency). Because it is a rather
tricky subject, one of the most prominent doctors rather quickly does not dare
to help him anymore, but he has a friendly colleague from Moscow who will
probably dare. And during the first Skype conversation with Grigory Rodchenkov
you immediately notice a joviality and genuine interest that Bryan probably
didn’t expect either. Their collaboration goes smoothly from the start, no matter
how weird Bryan finds it how easily testosterone and other doping products are
discussed. He submits to Gigory’s firm doping regime, gets to know tricks to avoid
doping controls in the process, and then it’s time for the new Haute Route.
Seven days later, when the race is over and Bryan, with his 32nd
place finish, is just about to conclude that doping therefore not made him
perform better, Grigory’s name suddenly appears in the international press as
the head of the corrupt Moscow anti-doping laboratory, which, especially around
the Sochi Games, did everything that everyone outside Russia had forbidden.
Grigory’s initial reaction is one of “Oh well, it’s just a game”, but soon it
appears safer for him to leave Moscow.
On the one hand it is a pity
that Fogel’s conclusion about doping is logically pushed directly into the
background by Grigory’s revelations, because that also seemed to become
incredibly interesting. On the other hand, right after the first year, Grigory
tells us they’ve only been busy on the second floor of the ‘doping house’ and
that there’s a bit more possible on the second and third floors. But at that
point the documentary literally turns into a geopolitical thriller of
unprecedented proportions. Indeed, it is primarily Grigory’s hard drives that
provide WADA with evidence of a 100% state-sponsored doping program, so the
fact that Putin called him “an idiot” on national television, seems to proof
Grigory really knew too much. But one of the striking things in this documentary
is that Fogel just became friends with Grigory and he really wanted to help him
get the information out, but also to be able to live safely somewhere in
America, despite the fact that his wife and children had to stay behind in
Moscow. And at one point Fogel himself is the one who gives the doping authorities
Grigory’s information.
Even though Fogel obviously
plays with your emotions by cutting revelations in voiceover with images of
Putin in such a way that only the cinematic sound design is missing to bring
the film to a climax. This works very well, because it gives an even more untrustworthy
image than he already has. To what extent this is closer to the truth I do not
knowl the documentary does fit in our Western view of Russia of course. But
because former President of Sports, Moetko, is also allowed to tell his story,
I get the feeling that Fogel wanted to paint as broad a picture as possible,
given the public distance that the government has had to take with respect to
Rodchenkov.
“Icarus” is a very good documentary
and I really understand why it won and Oscar.
Rating: 4/
5