woensdag 18 februari 2026

Movie Review - Wuthering Heights

Director:
Emerald Fennell
Genre: Drama
Runtime: 136 minutes
Year: 2026
Starring: Margot Robbie, Jacob Elordi
 
Description: A passionate and tumultuous love story set against the backdrop of the Yorkshire moors, exploring the intense and destructive relationship between Heathcliff (Jacob Elordi) and Catherine Earnshaw (Margot Robbie).
 
Review: The 2026 film adaptation of “Wuthering Heights”, directed by Emerald Fennell (known for “Saltburn”), is a visual spectacle that unfortunately sacrifices the emotional depth of Emily Brontë’s masterpiece for style and provocation.

The film is undoubtedly beautiful to look at. The cinematography captures the rugged Yorkshire moors with and almost tangible atmosphere, and the costumes are Oscar-worthy. The addition of modern music by Charli XCX gives the film a bold, contemporary energy that will appeal especially to a younger generation.

Margot Robbie is the strongest element of the film. Robbie portrays Cathy torn between social expectations and wild desire. Cathy is highly unlikeable, complex character and Robbie really captured that.

Although Jacob Elordi, as Heathcliff, perfectly embodies the brooding heartthrob, his performance lacks the raw, exclusion-fueled pain that is essential to the character. As a result, he often comes across as a toxic, privileged man rather than the tormented orphan from the book.

That this adaptation is nothing like the book is an understatement. It’s a very bold interpretation of Brontë novel. The biggest flaw is that the film prioritizes sensuality over emotional depth. Fennell opts for shocking image and explicit scenes that distract rather than reinforce the tragic love story. I cannot even call it a love story, Cathy and Heathcliff are so toxic. There is really something wrong with you if you think what these two have in this movie is romantic.

“Wuthering Heights” is a bold, stylized reinterpretation that is great or the eyes but leaves the heart cold. It is and interesting film for those who love modern costume dramas, but those looking for the true soul of Brontë would do better to reread the book. Which I am definitely planning on doing.  

Rating: 3/ 5

80s Movie Review - Uncle Buck


Director:
John Hughes
Genre: Comedy
Runtime: 100 minutes
Year: 1989
Starring: John Candy, Jean Louisa Kelly, Macaulay Culkin, Gaby Hoffmann, Amy Madigan, Laurie Metcalf

Description: Laid back commitment-phobe Buck (John Candy) babysits his brother’s rebellious teenage daughter and cute younger brother and sister.

Review: “Uncle Buck” is a timeless comedy and a childhood and family favorite film. It combines John Candy’s chaotic humor and John Hughes’ warm, human direction.

When the parents of the Russell family have to leave in a hurry due to an emergency, there is only one option left for the care of their three children: Uncle Buck. Buck is a bachelor who loves gambling, drinking, and his roaring car. He is the last person you would expect to find in a neat suburb, which immediately sets the stage for many comical confrontations with rebellious teenager Tia and curious younger siblings Miles and Maizy.

I grew up with John Candy, his films always made me smile. As a kid, but also now as an adult. Candy carries this film with his enormous charisma. He manages to portray Buck as more than just a clumsy uncle; he gives the character a heart of gold and a surprisingly strong moral compass.

The interaction between Candy and young Macaulay Culkin is priceless and even served as inspiration for “Home Alone”. The conflict between Buck and his cynical teenage niece Tia provides the necessary dramatic depth.

Although some to of the jokes Buck’s tough guy approach feel typically 1980s, the film stands up thanks to its sincere emotion. It’s not just a film about a failed uncle learning to be a responsible babysitter, but above all about a family learning what unconditional support means.

Rating: 4/ 5

zondag 8 februari 2026

Book Review - My Husband's Wife by Alice Feeney

Title:
My Husband’s Wife
Author: Alice Feeney
Genre: Mystery
Published: 2026
 
Description: Eden Fox, an artist on the brink of her big break, sets off for a run before her first exhibition. When she returns to the home she recently movied into, Spyglass, an enchanting old house in Hope Falls, nothing is as it should be. Her key doesn’t fit. A woman, eerily similar to her, answers the door. And her husband insists that the stranger is his wife.
 
One house. One husband. Two women. Someone is lying.
 
Six months earlier, a reclusive Londoner called birdy, reeling from a life-changing diagnosis, inherits Spyglass. This unexpected gift from a long-lost grandmother brings her to the pretty seaside village of Hope Falls. But then Birdy stumbles upon a shadowy London clinic that claims to be able to predict a person’s date of death, including her own. Secrets start to unravel, and as the line between truth and lies blur, Birdy feels compelled to right some old wrongs.
 
Review: Alice Feeney’s books have become a hit or miss for me. I gave some five stars, I gave some two stars. “My Husband’s Wife” fall right in the middle.
 
Meet Eden Fox. She and her husband Harisson just moved to a seaside village called Hope Falls. When she returns from a run, Eden realizes her key doesn’t fit the lock. A strange woman opens the door, claiming she is Eden and lives there with her husband Harisson. This woman has taken over Eden’s life and her husband is in on it.
 
The premise really intrigued me, it’s a terrifying situation. Eden is being gaslit and her isolation in the village of Hope Falls is palpable and oppressive. There is also a separate storyline, set six month earlier, that follows a woman named Birdy who inherited Spyglas, the house that Eden is living in now. The first half of the book grabbed my by the throat, because the threat is so personal and psychological.
 
Where the book lost is for me is in its credibility. Feeney loves plot twists and she has done some of the best in previous books. But she goes overboard with them at a certain point. The conspiracy that is going on in this book is so complex and dependent on coincidence that it undermines the foundation of the story. The subplot surrounding the “Death Date” clinic also feels at times like a superfluous element from another genre, distracting from the core of the story.
 
The craftsmanship of the writing style and the page-turning quality are undeniable. It’s an entertaining roller coaster ride, provided you’re willing to suspend your logical mind for a while. The book is steeped in Feeney’s characteristic darkness and unreliable characters, which I loved. But the balance between a brilliant plot and total implausibility sometimes tips just the wrong way.
 
Rating: 3/ 5

zondag 1 februari 2026

Book Review - All This & More by Peng Shepherd

Title:
All This & More
Author: Peng Shepherd
Genre: Science Fiction
Published: 2024
 
Description: Meek, play-it-safe Marsh has just turned forty-five, and her life is in shambles. Her career is stagnant, her marriage has imploded, and the teenage daughter grows more distant by the day. Marsch is convinced she’s missed her chance at everything – romance, professional fulfillment, and adventure – and is desperate for a do-over.
 
She can’t believe her luck when she’s elected to be the star of the global sensation “All This and More”, a show that uses quantum technology to allow contestants the change to revise their pasts and change their present lives. It’s Marsh’s only shot to seize her dreams, and she’s determined to get it right this time.
 
But even as she rises to become a famous lawyer, gets back together with her high school sweetheart, and travels the world, she begins to worry that “All This and More’s” promises might be too good to be true. Because while the technology is amazing, something seems a bit off.
 
Can Marsh really make her life everything she wants it to be. And is it worth it?
 
Review: Peng Shepherd’s “All This & More” attempts to build an ambitious bridge between a modern sci-fi thriller and the nostalgic “choose your own adventure” books from our childhood. Although the concept of a quantum-powered reality show in which you can rewrite your past is fascinating and intriguing, the execution unfortunately gets bogged down in repetition and superficiality.
 
Marsh hasn’t won in life; failing marriage, estranged daughter, no fulfillment from her job. She could use a do-over. To her surprise, Marsh is elected to take part in a reality TV show called “All This and More”, where quantum technology allows her to go back to her past life and make different life choices, altering her path.
 
Marsch is a protagonist that I just couldn’t sympathize with. Despite her chance to change everything, she often remains indecisive and naïve, which is frustrating. Her characters feels flat because she is constantly swept along by circumstances rather than truly steering them. These choices also felt meaningless. The book’s unique interactive element ultimately proves disappointing. Instead of truly different paths, you’re often led to the same storylines and I felt like the book wanted to direct us into certain paths too. You never feel that your choices really influence the fundamental outcome of the story until the very last pages.  
 
It’s a science fiction book, but the science behind the “bubble” and quantum mechanics is barely explored. Making the world-building feel paper-thin.
 
I loved the concept and how it actually plays with the fact that there is no such thing as a perfect life. Whatever choices you make in life, there will always be some bad moments. The book has three different endings. Two of these paths I wasn’t interested in and the ending I eventually choose wasn’t satisfying either. The book lacks depth, I didn’t sympathize with the main characters and the choose-your-own-adventure element was exciting at first but ended up being more controlled because it never really affected the storyline. For a book about life’s choices, I would recommend “The Midnight Library” by Matt Haig, not this.
 
Rating: 2/ 5

zaterdag 31 januari 2026

Movie Review - Send Help

Director:
Sam Raimi
Genre: Horror/ Thriller
Runtime: 113 minutes
Year: 2026
Starring: Rachel McAdams, Dylan O’Brien
 
Description: Linda (Rachel McAdams) and her insufferable boss Bradley (Dylan O’Brien) become stranded on a deserted island, the only survivors of a plane crash. Here, they must overcome past grievances and work together to survive, will they make it our alive?
 
Review: In the survival horror/ thriller “Send Help”, we are confronted not only with the brutal force of nature, but also with the psychological warfare between two survivors on a desert island. What begins as a classic survival story transforms, under the direction of Sam Raimi, into a claustrophobic study of power dynamics and the liberating power of feminine rage.

Rachel McAdams and Dylan O’Brien form an unexpected electric couple. When their plane crashes, the situation forces them to work together. O’Brien plays the insufferable CEO of a large company and he does this with a nervous energy that slowly turns into a toxic need to prove himself. But it’s Rachel McAdams who takes the film to the next level. Her characters Linda, a grey mouse at the office who’s talent is underestimated and taken advantage of, starts out controlled and pragmatic. But as the isolation sets in and the threat of her companion becomes greater than that of the wilderness, we see a transition that keeps the audience on the edge of their seats.

The film excels in its portrayal of feminine rage. This is not blind anger, but a calculated, deep-seated outburst against years of underestimation and manipulation. Because all the men in this movie are dicks. The scene in which McAdams’ character finally takes control feels not only like a victory in the jungle, but like a universal catharsis.

Director Sam Raimi does not abandon his horror roots, this is still an R-rated movie. The film contains some blood-curdling moments and has gore that will make the viewer physically recoil. The tension is masterfully built up. Although the pace slows down slightly in the second act, this more than compensated for by the satisfying finale.

“Send Help” is a brutal, emotional rollercoaster that gives Rachel McAdams her most powerful role in years. It is a film about the will to survive, but even more so about the power that is unleashed when a women refuses to be a victim any longer. An absolute must-see for anyone who loves psychological depth with a sharp edge.

Rating: 4/ 5

20s Movie Review - Avatar: Fire and Ash

Director:
James Cameron
Genre: Action/ Adventure/ Fantasy/ Science Fiction
Runtime: 197 minutes
Year: 2025
Starring: Sam Worthington, Zoe Saldaña, Sigourney Weaver, Stephen Lang, Oona Chaplin, Kate Winslet, Cliff Curtis,  CCH Pounder, Edie Falco, Giovanni Ribisi, Joel David Moore, Jermaine Clement, David Thewlis

Description: Jake (Sam Worthington) and Neytiri’s (Zoe Saldaña) family grapples with grief, encountering a new, aggressive Na’vi tribe, the Ash people, who are led by the fiery Varang (Oona Chaplin), as the conflict of Pandora escalates and a new moral focus emerges.

Review: “Avatar: Fire and Ash” is the third installment in the “Avatar” franchise. Director James Camerom proves that Pandora is far from revealing all its secret. Whereas its predecessor immersed us in  the serene beauty of the oceans, this third film confronts us with the raw, destructive, and paradoxically beautiful power of fire.

It almost goes without saying, but the CGI is once again groundbreaking. The introduction of the Ash People – a Na’vi clan that lives in volcanic areas – provides a completely new color palette. The contrast between the glowing lava and the ash-gray skin of this new tribe is visually stunning. The action scenes, especially the confrontations in the ash clouds, are so fluid and detailed that you forget you are watching an animation.

We see that not all Na’vi are “good”. The Ash People, led by Varang, bring a much-needed nuance to the story. Their anger and thirst for revenge mirror humanity, blurring the line between hero and villain. This gives the film an emotional depth and a sense of menace that we haven’t felt to this extent before.

The core of the film remains the family. The dynamic between Jake, Neytiri and their children has matured. The consequences of their earlier losses weigh heavily, and the film takes time for mourning and internal conflicts. Zoe Saldaña’s acting is heartbreaking; her anger is almost palpable.

“Avatar: Fire and Ash” is more than a technological masterpiece; it’s an epic drama that dares to play with darkness and moral ambiguity. With a running time of over three hours, not a minute feels wasted. The middle section is a bit predictable, but the explosive finale more than makes up for it. I believe there is still two more movies in the making, and I’m in up for it.

Rating: 4/ 5

zondag 25 januari 2026

00s Movie Review - Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

Director:
Michel Gondry
Genre: Drama/ Romance/ Science Fiction
Runtime: 108 minutes
Year: 2004
Starring: Jim Carrey, Kate Winslet, Tom Wilkinson, Kirsten Dunst, Mark Ruffalo, Elijah Wood, Jane Adams, David Cross

Description: When their relationship turns sour, a couple undergoes a medical procedure to have each other erased from their memories forever.

Review: What I would call this genre? Science Fiction/ Romance maybe? “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind” explores the value of painful memories. Joel and Clementine are in a relationship, but when things turn bad they decide to erase each other from their memory. Director Michel Gondry and screenwriter Charlie Kaufman created a visually striking, dreamlike film.

Jim Carrey and Kate Winslet should not be matching, but they do. Perfectly so. Carrey shows a surprising subdued side of himself, while Winslet brings color and energy to the film. It’s a unique, sometimes chaotic film about the complexity of love and the resilience of the human spirit. It prompts reflection on whether erasing painful memories is desirable.

I think we can say the “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind” can be considered a modern classic. I believe everyone who loves cinema should see this film at least once.

Rating: 5/ 5