vrijdag 7 augustus 2020
00s Movie Review - Terug Naar de Kust
Genre: Thriller
Runtime: 110 minutes
Year: 2009
Starring: Linda de Mol, Huub Stapel, Pierre Bokma, Daan Schuurmans, Ariane Schluter, Jaap Spijkers, Stefan de Walle, Koen de Bouw
Description: Maria (Linda de Mol) tries to escape a stalker by moving with her children to her sister’s isolated beach house.
Review: “Terug Naar de Kust” is a movie based on the novel written by the Dutch bestselling author Saskia Noort. She decided director Will Koopman would be the best choice to adapt it to the big screen, together with her husband Lex Wertwijn, who is a screenwriter and cameraman. And where the book has a lot of tension, the movie lacks it and somehow the story lost its edge too.
Maria Vos is the mother of two and has a relationship with the impetuous Geert, with whom she plays in a band. However, the relationship between the two is very tense and she ends it. When Maria discovers she is pregnant, she decides to have an abortion. Shortly afterwards she receives a number of bizarre anonymous messages, in which she is called a murderer and gets death threats. The police advise her to ‘disappear’ for a while, when they investigate the case. Maria leaves to stay with her older sister Ans, who owns a villa by the sea. There too, however, she finds no rest; she is confronted with traumatic childhood memories, and her mental health seems to deteriorate further and further.
Director Koopman has been given a considerable cast for her feature debut. Of course there is Linda de Mol, very loved in The Netherlands and a gifted actress. In addition, she managed to stand tall against Huub Stapel (with a relatively small role) who is probably one of the best actors in The Netherlands. And there is also Ariane Schluter, Pierre Bokman and Daan Schuurmans to accompany them. With such a great star cast, little can go wrong when it comes to acting. You might say. Nevertheless, Koopman hardly manages to let any of them come to full bloom. De Mol for example, acts way below her level and Stapel has little to work with to make an impact. Schuurmans does his best and is good, the relationship between his character Geert and Maria comes off as forced and is unbelievable.
The plot lacks tension, there a too long uninteresting segments and a climax that you could see coming from a mile away. The entire film is just not captivating enough. With such source material, which did have tension and was interesting and surprising, it’s really a mystery why this movie didn’t work.
Rating: 2 / 5
donderdag 6 augustus 2020
Ranking the Franchise - Cornetto Trilogy (Blood and Ice Cream Trilogy)
3. The World’s End (2013)
This final part of a loosely connected trilogy focuses on five childhood friends who, twenty years after a failed pub crawl in their hometown, make a new attempt. But in the old village not everything turns out to be okay. It’s an unconventional mix of nostalgic tragicomedy and sci-fi-spectacular, with a strong cast, infectious humor and cleverly choreographed action and fight scenes.
2. Shaun of the Dead (2004)
Shaun suffers greatly from the breakup with his girlfriend Liz. His roommate Ed doesn’t have much, he’s too busy gaming, drinking and other shenanigans. Yet Ed turns out to be handy to have around, when residents of a suburb of London appear to suffer from a zombie virus. It’s the first film in the trilogy, with subtle hints and great visual humor.
1. Hot Fuzz
In Sanford, ominous things happen. The gardens are too neat, the facades too clean. No town can become ‘Village of the Year” three times in a row, without a bad practice behind it. Policeman Danny Butterman and his over-ambitious colleague Nicholas Angel are investigating. It’s a cheerful, humorous film with a great eye for detail, in which melancholy uncomfortable and masterly jokes alternate.
woensdag 5 augustus 2020
10s Movie Review - The Fundamentals of Caring
Director: Rob Burnett
Genre: Comedy/ Drama
Runtime: 97
minutes
Year:
2016
Starring: Paul Rudd,
Craig Roberts, Selena Gomez, Megan Ferguson, Jennifer Ehle, Bobby Cannavale,
Julia Denton
Description: A man (Paul
Rudd) suffering a family loss enrolls in a class about care-giving that changes
his perspective on life.
I WATCHED THIS MOVIE FOR MY 2020 MOVIE CHALLENGE
WEEK 32: A NETFLIX ORIGINAL FILM
Review: “The
Fundamentals of Caring” is a Netflix Original film about Ben and Trevor. After a
terrible tragedy and a divorce, Ben decides to go to work as a care-giver for
the eighteen-year-old Trevor. The cheeky teenager is in a wheelchair due to muscular
dystrophy and does exactly the same thing day in day out. He has breakfast at
the same time every day with waffles and sausages, he watches the same TV show
every day and goes to the park from one to four once a week. Ben wants to get
Trevor out of his rut by going on a road trip together.
It's inevitable not to think of movies like “Intouchables”
and “Me Before You” when you start watching “The Fundamentals of Caring”. But
it wouldn’t be fair to compare them with each other. So I will not, because
this movie has a lot good things to be said about.
Despite the fact that “The Fundamentals of Caring”
deals with heavy subject matter, it never becomes a heavy film. Everything is
played out very light-hearted and funny. And it has a great balance between
serious and funny.
Paul Rudd is one of those actors you can impossibly dislike.
He is one of the most loveable actors in Hollywood and I always enjoy watching
him. He fits his role perfectly and I really loved him in this. Selena Gomez,
on the other hand, comes off as a bit annoying at times. But she is in the film
just enough to not be bothered by it completely.
The concept might not be original, because it has been
done before and it has been done better. But “The Fundamentals of Caring” is a
really strong film, that I would probably rewatch at some point. A hidden gem
on Netflix.
Rating: 4/ 5
dinsdag 4 augustus 2020
90s Movie Review - Clueless
Director: Amy Heckerling
Genre: Comedy/
Romance
Runtime: 97
minutes
Year:
1995
Starring: Alicia
Silverstone, Paul Rudd, Stacey Dash, Brittany Murphy, Donald Faison, Wallace
Shawn, Breckin Meyer, Jeremy Sisto, Dan Hedaya
Description: Rich high school
student Cher (Alicia Silverstone) tries to boost a new pupil's popularity, but
reckons without affairs of the heart getting in the way.
Review: “Clueless” is a teen comedy directed by Amy Heckerling, who was also
responsible for “Fast Times at Ridgemont High”. You could see “Clueless” as a
satire, that is loosely based on Jane Austen’s novel “Emma”.
If there is someone that
belongs in the ‘in-crowd’, it’s Cher Horowitz. She is almost sixteen, rich and
very popular. Some might think she is shallow, but selfish… Anyone can go to
her for advice about the more important things in life, like dating, shopping
and looks. Cher and her best friend Dionne decide to give new girl Tai a
make-over, because Tai is totally clueless. But that causes for a lot of unwanted
change in Cher’s life.
Cher is played by Alicia
Silverstone, who broke through with this role. She is perfect for the role. You
could say it’s all very over the top, but that’s what suits this film.
“Clueless” is a fun film and
a favorite with the girls who were teens themselves when the movie came out.
The dialogues are catchy and some of the teen problems are pretty recognizable.
“Clueless” has it all:
charm, intelligence, humor and romance. It’s a shallow film with layers and a
healthy dose teen humor. No matter how many times you see it, “Clueless”
entertains me every time.
Rating: 5/
5
maandag 3 augustus 2020
00s Movie Review - Howl's Moving Castle
Director: Hayao Miyazaki
Genre: Animation/
Adventure/ Romance/ Fantasy
Runtime: 119
minutes
Year:
2004
Starring: Christian Bale, Jeanne Simmons, Emily Mortimer, Billy Crystal, Blythe
Danner, Lauren Bacall, Josh Hutcherson, Jena Malone
Description: When an
unconfident young woman (Emily Mortimer) is cursed with an old body by a
spiteful witch (Lauren Bacall), her only chance of breaking the spell lies with
a self-indulgent yet insecure young wizard (Christian Bale) and his companions
in his legged, walking castle.
Review: Within the field of Japanese animated film or anime there is an enormous
variety of genres, and a dazzling difference in quality. While Foxkids daily
bombards youthful viewers with yet another uninspired Pokémon clone, films from
the renowned Studio Ghibli are screened at prestigious film festivals. Hayao Miyazaki
is considered the master within the anime world, and rightly so. “Howl’s Moving
Castle”, an adaptation of the book by British fantasy author Diana Wynne Jones,
will not achieve a classis status, but is again a wonderful animation.
“Howl’s Moving Castle” is
set in an imaginary Central European kingdom at the beginning of the 20th
century, a fairy tale variant of Austria or Hungary. The worlds of magic and
industry are still intertwined: while people are already moving by steam train
and flying machine, the enigmatic wizard Howl hides his walking castle amidst
the misty mountains. That castle is a true piece of Miyazaki’s art: a giant,
pulsating huddle of metal and wood, held together and propelled by a demonic
force.
The timid young seamstress
Sophie accidentally comes into contact with Howl himself, and is therefore
transformed by his enemy, the Witch of the Waste, into an ancient female. To break
the spell, she sets off in her new form on her way to the mountains: to find
Howl, or another magician who can break her spell.
As an old Sophie finds out
that although her body no longer cooperates, she has suddenly become a lot more
balanced and is no longer surprised by a lot of things. She finds Howl’s castle
and in no time at all makes herself a housekeeper. Together with the little boy
Markl and the fire demon Calcifer, she forms the entourage of the charming but
freaky Howl, who sets off at night to face the advancing war in the region. Little
by little, Sophie finds out what magical powers are at work in the kingdom and what
the alliance between Howl and Calcifer means. And as always with Miyazaki,
hardly anyone is who he seems at first sight.
Another ingredient in every
Miyazaki movie are the wonderful and often funny characters, and in “Howl’s
Moving Castle” too. An absolute favorite is Calcifer, the mighty demon that
sees itself reduced to a cozy fire. He is hilarious and endearing at the same
time. But the contrast withing the main characters is great. Especially Howl
remains a sketchy figure who does not really come to life, even though he is provided
with a complex background story. Why he cares so much about the war and what
all this has to do with his monstrous side, remains in the dark. There are many
elements and characters in the film that are not really well-executed. This makes
the story more obscure. The film loses a bit of logic towards the end.
All this does not alter the
fact that “Howl’s Moving Castle” is still worth watching. It’s not a
masterpiece, like many of Miyazaki’s films are, but it can still easily enchant
an audience with its beautiful animation and images.
Rating: 3,5/
5








