Posts tonen met het label Bob Odenkirk. Alle posts tonen
Posts tonen met het label Bob Odenkirk. Alle posts tonen

zaterdag 20 augustus 2022

TV Show Review - Better Call Saul (Season 6)

Season:
6
Genre: Drama/ Comedy
Number of episodes: 13
Year: 2022
Starring: Bob Odenkirk, Jonathan Banks, Rhea Seehorne, Patrick Fabian, Michael Mando, Giancarlo Esposito, Mark Margolis, Tony Dalton, Aaron Paul, Bryan Cranston

Description: The trials and tribulations of criminal lawyer Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) in the time before he established his strip-mall law office in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Review: The sin that many film and television makers commit when making prequels, us putting the familiar characters in mortal danger. It’s an empty way of cheating suspense, because the story is set in the past, we know in advance that these characters are going to survive. “Better Call Saul”, thankfully” has pretty much never been guilty of this. In this final season, everything falls neatly into place.

WARNING: THIS REVIEW MIGHT CONTAIN SPOILERS!!!

The opening of the final season differs from that of the previous five seasons. Instead of black-and-white images showing what the absconding Jimmy McGill, better known as Saul Goodman, is up to, a different kind of prologue immediately picks up after the cliffhanger of season five. what concerns Jimmy after the events of “Breaking Bad” is not addressed untiol a later episode.

Just as the creators know their audience by avoiding life-threatening scenes, they also know that fans expected the timeline to collide with the perils of Walter White and Jesse Pinkman in this final season. It does, but not in the way we thought it would. In theory, it’s interesting that the two storylines will intertwine, but in practive that would take away from the focus of the series. Which, therefore, thankfully stays with Jimmy.

SO once he’s at the point where the world to know him as Saul Goodman, the creators for the most part take us into the “present” where we see what he’s made of as Gene. As manager of a cinnamon roll bakery in a mall, he kept a low profile for a long time but in the last season, a random passerby recognized him from the commercials of his lawyer days. Is Gene the version of Jimmy who has learned from his mistakes? Or is he creeping back into the role of Slippin’ Jimmy, the con man who gets away with it more often than not?

The biggest question that surfaced years ago is how his wife Kim Wexler fits into the picture. She seems to be the linchpin of Jimmy’s life, so where will she be the moment he becomes Walter Whites lawyer? This final season finally provides an answer to that, revealing how (un)important she really is to him. In addition, we also memorably learn the conclusion of the chronic bashing of Howard Hamlin, Jimmy and Kim’s former boss who has been the target of their harassment since they left.

As it always does in this world, actions have their consequences. They shaped Jimmy into who is was and who he is. As with its predecessor, at many points in “Better Call Saul” the tension was incredibly high, but the pace was always slow. This continues in a final episode that doesn’t rely on sensation or action, but keeps you captivated by leaving you wondering. Where does this end? What’s his plan?

The season flies by thanks to the usual top-notch acting and the sleek cinematography that regularly recalls the visual work of the Coen Brothers. There was once a rumor that the spin-off series about Saul Goodman was going to be a comedy series, but it’s a blessing that the creators stuck to their established style.

Unlike Walter White, Jimmy McGill continually switches paths in life. Somewhere he wants to be free of his shenanigans, but somehow it’s in his nature. He is constantly in the middle of good and bad.
Like “Breaking Bad”, “Better Call Saul” is one of the few shows that has no single bad season, it’s solid throughout. I loved the show, hated that it had to end, but it ended perfectly. And many questions we had Saul Goodman, after “Breaking Bad”, were answered. The circle is complete and I couldn’t be happier with the result.

donderdag 18 november 2021

Movie Review - Nobody

Director:
Ilya Naishuller
Genre: Action/ Crime
Runtime: 92 minutes
Year: 2021
Starring: Bob Odenkirk, Connie Nielsen, Aleksey Serebryakov, Christopher Lloyd, Michael Ironside, Colin Salmon, RZA, Billy MacLellan, Ayara Mengesha, Gage Munroe, Aleksandr Pal, Humberly González, Edsson Morales, J.P. Manoux, Adrian McLean
 
Description: A docile family man (Bob Odenkirk) slowly reveals his true character after his house gets burgled by two petty thieves, which, coincidentally, leads him going to a bloody war with a Russian crime boss.

Review: Bob Odenkirk, mostly known for his role as Saul Goodman in “Breaking Bad” and “Better Call Saul”, is not you typical action star. Especially given the fact that Odenkirk is already in his late fifties and he hasn’t done anything action-packed like this before. And it can go wrong, making an actor do something completely different. In “Nobody” it really works and Odenkirk is utterly convincing as the jaded family man Hutch, whose life contains very little tension. But then one night his house is broken into and he sees an opportunity to overpower one of the burglars. But Hutch is smart enough to refrain from such unnecessary provocations. But no matter how well he managed to de-escalate the situation, the experience does something to him. He eventually goes after them, but ends up in a fight with a Russian crime boss.
“Nobody” does remind me of movies like “A History of Violence” or “John Wick”, and it clearly took some inspiration from them. But in the details, you can tell that the filmmakers have thought about the subject matter just a bit more than is usual for this kind of movie. Because it’s mostly an action film, for the most part very serious.
The strongest asset remains the casting of Bob Odenkirk. It seems like a movie for action stars like Bruce Willis or Liam Neeson, but with Odenkirk we actually have someone who actually looks like a normal civilian instead of a born action hero who has to act against his image in the first act. And when Hutch’s true nature is revealed, we see him taking at least as many punches as he gives out. The result is a character for whom it can be rightly feared that he will lose out. The lesson is not that Odenkirk should get every action role from now on, but that ore roles like this would enrich the action genre.
I really loved “Nobody”, and with a standard action star this movie would be a ‘nobody’ film. But by choosing someone like Odenkirk, this movie is given something that makes the film stand-out from others in the genre.

Rating: 4 / 5

dinsdag 15 september 2020

10s Movie Review - Long Shot

Director: Jonathan Levine
Genre: Comedy/ Romance
Runtime: 124 minutes
Year: 2019
Starring: Seth Rogen, Charlize Theron, O’Shea Jackson Jr., June Diane Raphael, Ravi Patel, Bob Odenkirk, Andy Serkis, Randall Park, Lisa Kudrow, Alexander Skarsgård

Description: Journalist Fred Flarsky (Seth Rogen) reunites with his childhood crush, Charlotte Field (Charlize Theron), now one of the most influential women in the world. As she prepares to make a run for the Presidency, Charlotte hires Fred as her speechwriter and sparks fly.

I WATCHED THIS MOVIE FOR MY 2020 MOVIE CHALLENGE.
WEEK 38: A POLITICAL MOVIE

Review: Opposites attract. A given for many romantic comedies. But when the chemistry is bad, it doesn’t work. Luckily for us, the very different Charlize Theron and Seth Rogen work super well together. A very unlikely duo in a very different kind of romcom.
First, the contrast: Rogen plays the cheeky investigative journalist Fred Flarsky. He refuses to work for a money-hungry media tycoon and quits his job. Theron is Secretary of State Charlotte, very ambitious and wants to run for President. The two know each other from their childhood. When their paths cross at a party, Fred manages to make an unforgettable impression on Charlotte. Because she has to work on her sense of humor, she hires Fred to write her speeches.
Although there is a high degree of predictability present, it doesn’t bother here. Because director Jonathan Levine invests in his characters, their attraction, journeys and setbacks. Which makes “Long Shot” not one of those disposable romcoms, but one with actual depth and dimensional characters. With that, the predictability is easy to forgive.
“Long Shot” also constantly keeps balance. Fred and Charlotte go through palpable emotions and doubts. The supporting characters are simply their for support, they never try to outshine the main characters, they aren’t annoying and are above all functional for the story.
The ending might be a tad to sweet, but overall “Long Shot” is a great romcom set with a political background and two leads that work better together then you might expect. I also love the fact that there is a strong moral compass here: fight for what you love, no matter what the majority thinks. A good, strong comedy.

Rating: 3,5 / 5

vrijdag 10 juli 2020

TV Show Review - Better Call Saul (Season 5)

Season: 5
Genre: Drama/ Comedy
Number of episodes: 10
Year: 2020
Starring: Bob Odenkirk, Jonathan Banks, Rhea Seehorne, Patrick Fabian, Michael Mando, Giancarlo Esposito, Mark Margolis, Tony Dalton, Dean Norris

Description: The trials and tribulations of criminal lawyer Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) in the time before he established his strip-mall law office in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Review: “Better Call Saul” is a spin-off and a prequel to (and to a very limited extent it has some sequel elements) the series “Breaking Bad”, a series considered by many to be the best series ever made. It is therefore all the more impressive that “Better Call Saul” is often also considered one of the best series of the moment. Both “Breaking Bad” and “Better Call Saul” are certainly among my favorite series and I think the latter is THE best show of the moment. “Better Call Saul” ‘breathes’ “Breaking Bad”, but has its own identity. This is partly because of the cast’s excellent performance, but also because the series takes its own route, separate from “Breaking Bad”.
“Better Call Saul” focuses on the eccentric lawyer Jimmy McGill, who was introduced as the corrupt lawyer Saul Goodman in season 2 of “Breaking Bad”. “Better Call Saul” is about how Jimmy is slowly changing into Saul, but also offers a lot of background information about other well-known “Breaking Bad” characters, such as Gustavo Frink, the Salamanca family and Mike Ehremantrout.
At the end of the previous season, we first heard of Jimmy’s plans to become Saul Goodman and at the start of season five Jimmy definitively evolves into Saul Goodman. Apart from the fact that he has his name changed, his moral compass is becoming more and more absent. He continues to come up with ideas to win lawsuits that are on the boundary of what is permissible. The market Saul will focus on is that of petty criminals. In addition, this season he becomes more involved in the drug world in Albuquerque, New Mexico. As a result, the transition from “Better Call Saul” to “Breaking Bad” is closer than ever.
Besides Saul, his girlfriend Kim Wexler and handyman Mike are also going through important developments. Mike seems to get used to the role of handyman for the underworld and Kim, who used to serve as a moral compass for Saul, seems to get used to stretching boundaries. The gradual development of these characters has been underway since the first season, but has been built up in a very credible way that the viewers will still sympathize them.
Bob Odenkirk is at its best, but it’s Rhea Seehorne’s season. She is incredibly good as Kim Wexler in this fifth season. And Odenkirk is fantastic too, especially in the season’s 8th episode “Bagman”, which is the best episode of the show so far.
Despite the fact that “Better Call Saul” as a stand-alone series is perfectly watchable, it is advisable to watch “Breaking Bad” first, if you haven’t seen it yet. Season six will most likely be the last season of “Better Call Saul” and the references to “Breaking Bad” will become more frequent, to a point where the shows will meet or overlap each other. Season five will be more enjoyed with the foreknowledge, since one new big character from “Breaking Bad” makes a surprise entrance and the feud between the Salamanca family and Gus Frink will be deepened a lot.
It is inevitable to compare “Better Call Saul” with “Breaking Bad”. Many characters are similar, it takes place in the same region and the cinematographic similarities are not to be missed. “Better Call Saul” is a bit slower than “Breaking Bad”, but that’s one of the strengths of the series. But season five is their best season so far and just as good as the entire series of “Breaking Bad”. This season proofs that “Better Call Saul” is the best series running today. I can’t wait for season six, what it most likely going to be the final season. Hopes are that Walter White and Jesse Pinkman will make an appearance.

zaterdag 4 juli 2020

TV Show Review - Better Call Saul (Season 4)

Season: 4
Genre: Drama/ Comedy
Number of episodes: 10
Year: 2018
Starring: Bob Odenkirk, Jonathan Banks, Rhea Seehorne, Patrick Fabian, Michael Mando, Michael McKean, Giancarlo Esposito, Mark Margolis, Tony Dalton, Rainer Bock

Description: The trials and tribulations of criminal lawyer Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) in the time before he established his strip-mall law office in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Review: The fourth season of the “Breaking Bad” spin-off has reach great heights. They are now so close to the aforementioned “Breaking Bad”. The structure, the direction, the music, the dialogues, the cinematography and the actors; everything seems to be right. The two series come awfully close to each other in this fourth season.
“Better Call Saul” tells the story of James “Jimmy” McGill and his difficult journey to become the lawyer we know so well from “Breaking Bad”: Saul Goodman. Season four comes so close that you can almost feel the presence of Walter White and Jesse Pinkman. But it’s Bob Odenkirk who steals the show. He knows how to surprise and grab the viewer. But also the other characters/ actors. Where in the first seasons, Odenkirk depended on his supporting actors, he starts carrying the show more and more.
The dialogues are sharp and the images beautiful. And it’s a joy to watch all the great performances on this show. From Rhea Seehorne as Kim Wexler to Jonathan Banks as Mike Ehremantrout to Giancarlo Esposito as Gustavo Fring. It’s a joy to watch them all. But Bob Odenkirk is king in this season.
“Better Call Saul” is a series that rises above other shows running now. In terms of quality but especially in craftmanship of the characters and the story. Jimmy’s failed path is beautifully told through the seasons, but the fourth season somehow seems sadder, more melancholy and dark. It’s the time they take to tell the story, the “Breaking Bad” atmosphere hanging over your head and the events happening. Jimmy is more human then ever, more vulnerable. That humanity and vulnerability makes Jimmy feel like one of us, not just a rogue lawyer. He knows how to grab the viewers with his imperfections and not-so-clever actions. He does hardly play by the rules, but inside there is a very good heart. And that makes for you to relate to Jimmy.
I still don’t think “Better Call Saul” is better than “Breaking Bad”, but it’s coming awfully close.

vrijdag 3 juli 2020

Movie Review - Little Women

Director: Greta Gerwig
Genre: Drama/ Romance
Runtime: 135 minutes
Year: 2019
Starring: Saoirse Ronan, Emma Watson, Florence Pugh, Eliza Scanlen, Laura Dern, Timothée Chalamet, Tracy Letts, Bob Odenkirk, Meryl Streep, Chris Cooper, James Norton, Louis Garrel

Description: Jo March (Saoirse Ronan) reflects back and forth on her life, telling the beloved story of the March sisters: four young women, each determined to live life on her own terms.

Review: Louisa May Alcott’s novel “Little Women” has stimulated filmmaker’s fantasies for over a hundred years. The story, which revolves around four sister who tried to develop their artistic talent during the American Civil War, has been adapted for film several times. But never as good as now. After the highly praised “Lady Bird”, director Great Gerwig once again delivers a feminist tour de force, bubbling with life. “Little Women” is an anything but stiff and old-fashioned costume drama. See for example the smooth dialogue Gerwig has written for her female protagonists. The ladies don’t wait their turn before they are allowed to speak, but tumble verbally constantly. This gives the film a lot of dynamic.
Louisa May Alcott’s novel is divided into two separate periods, in which the youth and adulthood of the sisters Jo, Amy, Beth and Meg March are the focus. Gerwig remains faithful to the content of this story, but fortunately does not opt for the same, predictable structure of the book. She cuts up the two timelines and mixes them up, creating a story structure that is actually much more exciting. Because only gradually does it become clear how the past exactly influenced the present.
Although the story takes place in the nineteenth century, “Little Women” often feels surprisingly contemporary. This is mainly because the traditional division of roles between men and women is changing. Whereas the women with their fiery ambitions are the driving force behind this story, the men are merely on the sidelines as spectators or desperate love interests. And yet it is inevitable that even the sisters come up against certain limits set by sexism as they travel their ambitious life path.
Jo in particular is sick and tired of doing what is expected by society. She has no interest whatsoever in marrying a rich man, but above all she wants to be independent and publish her own novel. Even if this means ending up lonely and poor. Sister Amy, on the other hand, is much more willing to give up her dreams in exchange for security and prosperity. It is there kinds od contradictions from which the subtle drama in “Little Women” derives its power. Gradually, the bond between the sisters dissolves in the flow of time, after which each one chooses her own path and different destinies become visible.
Finally, it should be mentioned that Greta Gerwig has brought together a star cast for “Little Women”. Afterwards the performances by Saoirse Ronan and Florence Pugh, both nominated for an Oscar, will remain in the memory. But the real star is Greta Gerwig herself, who, with her skillfully crafted costume drama, once again resounds a strong feminist sound in Hollywood. Sadly the Academy didn’t acknowledged her great direction for an award.
I can’t fault “Little Women”, it’s a movie I could watch over and over again.

Rating: 5 / 5

donderdag 2 juli 2020

TV Show Review - Better Call Saul (Season 3)

Season: 3
Genre: Drama/ Comedy
Number of episodes: 10
Year: 2017
Starring: Bob Odenkirk, Jonathan Banks, Rhea Seehorne, Patrick Fabian, Michael Mando, Michael McKeen, Giancarlo Esposito, Mark Margolis

Description: The trials and tribulations of criminal lawyer Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) in the time before he established his strip-mall law office in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Review: I don’t know if everyone thought it was a good idea to create a prequel to one of the best series ever made: “Breaking Bad”. Yet Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould dared to create a series about one of the supporting roles Saul Goodman, here still Jimmy McGill. The somewhat shady lawyer entered the “Breaking Bad” universe in season 2 and with his role he added a lot of comedic elements to the series.
“Better Call Saul” was also originally intended as a light-hearted comedy, Gilligan and Gould soon decided that it had to be a drama series, combined with the comedy we know Saul Goodman for. Because “Better Call Saul” is set a few years before “Breaking Bad”, the makers were able to allow some other iconic character from that show to resume their roles. And we get an exciting ‘new’ one in the third season.
In the third season, Jimmy McGill has developed a lot from season one. But he is still not Saul Goodman as we know him so well from “Breaking Bad”. He is still trying to be a successful lawyer by trial and error. At the start of the season, Jimmy still shares a law firm in Albuquerque with Kim Wexler, who is also his girlfriend. In addition, tension between him and his brother Chuck is increasing, especially when it turns out that Chuck has incriminating evidence about Jimmy that could seriously ruin him.
Parallel to these storylines, we follow the story of Mike. At the end of the second season, Mike wanted to deal once and for all with the Mexican cartel boss Hector Salamanca who threatened him and his granddaughter. At the moment of truth however, he was stopped by a stranger. And it is the return of the iconic, brilliant fast-food magnate Gustavo Fring. Many fans, including myself, looked forward to his possible return. And finally, in the third season, one of the best villains in television history actually returns. The way Fring is introduced is brilliant and, despite virtually nothing happening in it, the scene in which he first appeared is a nail-biter.
The main focus of this season is the feud between the McGill brothers, which seems to be working towards a climax. I won’t spoil it for you, but the fifth episode is so incredibly good that you can let go of any doubts you’ve had about “Better Call Saul”. It’s the best episode of the season. Great acting by Bob Odenkirk, Rhea Seehorn and especially Michael McKean. McKean as Chuck turned out to be more of a villainous character in season 2, but is even given more layers in the third season. He is at the top of his game here.
The same goes for Odenkirk, who has given Jimmy so much depth in all three season. And Rhea Seehorn is also formidable, her character Kim Wexler functions as the moral compass of the series. Jonathan Banks and Giancarlo Esposito (Mike and Fring) only have smaller roles, but shine every moment they get.
As we already know from previous seasons and “Breaking Bad”, the camera work is beautiful. It’s so beautifully portrayed. And this combined with strong direction and a good screenplay, makes “Better Call Saul” in its third season again one of the best TV shows of the moment. It’s still not better than “Breaking Bad”, but often manages to come very close.
Some people mind the slow pace of the show, but I see it as the show’s strength. They take their time with the story, so that all the loose ends will be tied together in the end. And all the character’s choice and developments make sense.
The only downside of the show is that I believe Mike and Fring should have been given more screentime.
“Better Call Saul” is a series that can stand on its own, although you sometimes still make comparisons to “Breaking Bad”. I don’t think that will ever be different. But with a rock solid third season, it is as consistent as “Breaking Bad”. Again the season ends with a cliffhanger, so I can’t wait to be dragged into the sunny and dark world of Albuquerque.

dinsdag 30 juni 2020

TV Show Review - Better Call Saul (Season 2)

Season: 2
Genre: Drama/ Comedy
Number of episodes: 10
Year: 2016
Starring: Bob Odenkirk, Jonathan Banks, Rhea Seehorne, Patrick Fabian, Michael Mando, Michael McKeen, Ed Begley Jr.

Description: The trials and tribulations of criminal lawyer Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) in the time before he established his strip-mall law office in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Review: Looking back at last season’s ending, Jimmy’s in the courthouse parking garage. Inside are Kim Wexler and Howard Hamlin, who are waiting to introduce Jimmy to his upcoming new boss of the Santa Fe law firm Davis & Main. Jimmy meets senior partner Clifford Main and his two associates, but takes Kim aside. He asks her if anything would change between them if he takes the job. To which a surprised Kim reacts that one has nothing to do with the other. Jimmy accepts the answer and returns to the rest of the group, informing them he kindly declines the job offer. Later, Kim confronts Jimmy, now relaxing in a hotel pool, with his choice to miss the chance of his lifetime.
The first season of the “Breaking Bad” spin-off turned out to be a big success, which clearly showed that it good hold up the sky-high expectations everyone had about it. The second season picks up exactly where we were left off. “Better Call Saul” has a unique way of telling the story of Jimmy, from before he became the Saul Goodman we all know from “Breaking Bad” and even how he became who he is in “Better Call Saul”. It has a cautious pace, the storylines develop slowly, but the whole season is full of character and plot development. It’s a well-considered but also risky choice to stretch a season to ten episodes. However, creators Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould once again created a great atmosphere in a real-life rhythm, with an amazing sense of detail.
In this season Jimmy and Kim, with whom he maintains a personal and professional relationship, are within reach of the top of their careers. Jimmy is about to sign a contract with law firm Davis & Main, and Kim works for HHM. Yet neither of them are convinced that this is the right destination at this stage of their lives. Meanwhile Mike becomes increasingly involved in the dangerous drug world, when he comes into conflict with Hector Salamanca. This last storyline is a great addition to “Better Call Saul” and I’m glad Mike is a big part of season 2 as well. That’s a strength of the series, every character has his or her share and always influences the storyline in one way or another.
Bob Odenkirk is the most important person in the series, but it’s mainly Rhea Seehorn who brings the most depth to this season. Jimmy and Kim are two different individuals, and even though they both don’t quite want to believe this yet, Kim is constantly at odds with her morals.
Chuck also has a big role in the second season. Where in the first season we saw Chuck mainly as Jimmy’s envious brother and particularly hating Jimmy’s shady methods, this season he has turned out to be somewhat of a villain. Chuck is not much to blame, but because of the cleverly written storylines you automatically have the most sympathy for Jimmy. Even if I’s Jimmy who is bending the rules and the real crook, while Chuck is the one doing things by the book. And for this reason you can see that both Michael McKean and Bob Odenkirk really shine in their roles. And it’s the brother’s feud that left us with a cliffhanger, that probably sets the direct tone for the third season.

zaterdag 27 juni 2020

TV Show Review - Better Call Saul (Season 1)

Season: 1
Genre: Drama/ Comedy
Number of episodes: 10
Year: 2015
Starring: Bob Odenkirk, Jonathan Banks, Rhea Seehorne, Patrick Fabian, Michael Mando, Michael McKeen

Description: The trials and tribulations of criminal lawyer Jimmy McGill (Bob Odenkirk) in the time before he established his strip-mall law office in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Review: It was the most anticipated series of 2015, that debut in February of that year. The spin-off of one of the best series ever made: “Breaking Bad”. That the series would be a success was a given. The question was just how big. And since “Better Call Saul” was the number one cable series in America that year, it proofs that is was very big. Add to the overwhelmingly positive reviews and you have a series that might even be as good as the series it was based on. The first season of “Better Call Saul” is good, at times very good.
We follow the adventures of James ‘Jimmy’ McGill, before he becomes the Saul Goodman we know from “Breaking Bad”. In “Better Call Saul” we see how he became the super lawyer, but there is no mention of that just yet. Nobody takes Jimmy seriously and it frustrates him. He also takes care of his brother Chuck, who is the partner at a big law firm and is now dealing with a medical condition that prevents him from leaving the house.
In this season we see how Jimmy tries to get a place in the legal profession. We also see Mike Ehremantraut, who was a people’s favorite in “Breaking Bad” and in fact one of my favorite characters as well. We see how Mike ended up in Albuquerque. Does Jimmy manage to earn respect and establish his name? And why do they call him ‘”Slippin’ Jimmy’? We’ll get answers to these questions in this first season.
“Better Call Saul” is definitely one of the best show of the moment and the performances are extraordinary. The series contains of high quality shots, spot-on cinematography, just like its predecessor. Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould, also responsible for the success of “Breaking Bad”, once again succeed in making a series where we can exactly see what they were planning on making. It looks beautiful.
It's not one storyline the first season focuses on, there are several storylines which might not make it as catchy or memorable. The best episode was “Five-O”, which was carried by Jonathan Banks, who plays Mike. It was separate from the rest and didn’t feature a lot of Jimmy. It’s almost the ugly duckling episode of the season. But it’s a magnificent episode and very necessary.
Before I finish, I do want to mention Bob Odenkirk, who is the star of the show and the titular character. Odenkirk is a great actor, he already proved that in “Breaking Bad”. And here too. Throughout the season, Jimmy’s development is certainly rewarding. The pace is slow, but you can understand where Gilligan and Gould want to go. Odenkirk has and will have plenty of opportunity to embody multiple facets of Jimmy. Just look at the sharp dialogues and how convincingly Odenkirk knows how to bring it. So no complains about the acting. However, he does not (yet) have the gravitas that Bryan Cranston had. Cranston commanded every scene he was in and his Walter White will probably always be one of the greatest acting performances in TV history. You hated him for who he was, but at the same time you wanted him to slip further into madness. Jimmy McGill is not yet that kind of character and that becomes clear when you watch the episode “Five-O” and see how Jonathan Banks steals the show.
I’m late to the party, since I’m only starting “Better Call Saul” now. But I’m glad that I did, because it looks like this will become a new favorite eventually. I really loved the first season and something tells me it’s only going to get better.

dinsdag 13 november 2018

Movie Reviews - Incredibles 2

Director: Brad Bird
Genre: Animation/ Action
Runtime: 125 minutes
Year: 2018
Starring: Craig T. Nelson, Holly Hunter, Catherine Keener, Bob Odenkirk, Sophia Bush, Brad Bird, Isabella Rossellini, Samuel L. Jackson, John Ratzenberg, Barry Bostwick

Description: Bob Parr aka Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson) is left to care for the kids while Helen aka Elastigirl (Holly Hunter) is out saving the world.

Review: “Incredibles 2” takes off where the first film ended in 2004. The ‘Underminer’ attacks the city with a giant machine. Frozone manages to make sure it doesn’t crash a monorail and the Incredibles protect a safe in a bank, rescue a helpless granny and try to catch the Underminer. But they also have to look after Jack-Jack. “Incredibles 2” is a great joy to watch and very entertaining, but it’s never as good as the first.
Even before the golden age of superhero films, director Brad Bird showed us that the ‘Fantastic Four’ kind of film works. “The Incredibles” embraced strange super powers and payed an ode to the spy film. With bombastic music, retro futuristic cities, transforming vehicles, heroes running over water and super robots.
“Incredibles 2” brings us the same kind of spectacle. This time, Elastigirl gets all the big action scenes. Highlights are the vehicle Elasticycle, a chace with a flating train and a fight with Screenlaver. Pixar did it again with amazing animation techniques.
While Elastigirl is being a hero and hunting the mysterious Screenslaver, Mr. Incredible stays at home to take care of the kids. It’s cliché, the way Bob underestimates being a stay-at-home dad, while Helen is enjoying her new freedom. Both storylines are saved by the many action sequences. And the confrontation between Jack-Jack and a stubborn raccoon is something to mention. No word is said, but the creativity put into to this sequence is fantastic.
The villain Screenslaver isn’t as interesting as Syndrome from the original. Screenslaver is a bit more predictable and the motivation is a bit superficial.
The focus is mostly on Elastigirl and Jack-Jack, the rest is overshadowed a bit.
When it comes to action, great music and excellent animation, this film is perfect. The entertainment level is very high. But the story doesn’t add much more.

Rating: 4 / 5

woensdag 11 juli 2018

Movie Reviews - The Post

Director: Steven Spielberg
Genre: Drama
Runtime: 116 minutes
Year: 2017
Starring: Meryl Streep, Tom Hanks, Sarah Paulson, Bob Odenkirk, Bradley Whitford, Tracy Letts, Bruce Greenwood, Matthew Rhys, Alison Brie, Jesse Plemons, David Cross, Zach Woods, Pat Healy

Description: A cover-up that spanned four U.S. Presidents pushed the country's first female newspaper publisher (Meryl Streep) and a hard-driving editor (Tom Hanks) to join an unprecedented battle between the press and the government.

Review: It’s a sin to spoil the ending of a movie, unless it’s a film based on historic events. Because you already know the outcome (hopefully). In the last shot of “The Post”, there are hints to the Watergate affair. Due to two journalist of the Washington Post, this scandal came to light which eventually lead to Richard Nixon stepping away from his role as president of the US.
The paper already had a name and fame at that time. And how that happened, director Steven Spielberg shows us in “The Post”, where the journalists get their hand on the so-called Pentagon Papers. These classified documents are proof that the Vietnam war was always doomed to fail. And four presidents knew about it.
“The Post” is still relevant and a nod to Trump. But it also feels like a prequel to “All the President’s Men”, which was about the Watergate affair. But in “The Post” this isn’t as much focus on the case as there was in “All the President’s Men”.
We follow Kay Graham, the first female editor and trying to stay alive in a man’s world. And the fight that the Washington Post is constant battling agains the bigger paper, The New York Times.
When we see Hanks’ and Streep’s character together for the first time, we think that Hanks’ Ben Bradlee is superior to Streep’s Kay Graham. But in fact she is his boss. That was the role of a woman in business back then. People believe she is only boss because her husband died. Even during dinner, the women have to leave the table when the men talk business. Spielberg manages to picture this perfectly.
I wished there was a little bit more focus on the actual story they are trying to cover. Then this movie would have been even better. And I believe that if it wasn’t for Tom Hanks and Meryl Streep, “The Post” would have been average.

Rating: 3,5 / 5

donderdag 18 februari 2016

TV Review: "Fargo" Season 1

Genre: Drama/ Thriller/ Crime
Year: 2014
Number of episodes: 10
Starring: Martin Freeman, Billy Bob Thornton, Allison Tolman, Colin Hanks, Keith Carradine, Bob Odenkirk, Oliver Platt, Adam Goldman, Joey King, Gary Valentine, Kate Walsh, Rachel Blanchard, Joshua Close

Description: Various chronicles of deception, intrigue and murder in and around frozen Minnesota. Yet all of these tales mysteriously lead back one way or another to Fargo, North Dakota

Review: Lester Nygaard (Martin Freeman) lives together with his wife in Minnesota. He works as an insurance salesman in a little town called Bemidji. Lester never achieved anything big. His brother Lester on the other hand, is married to a beautiful woman, has a son and a good job. And Sam Hess, the guy who used to bully Lester in high school, is also doing well. When Lester’s wife is threatening to leave him, he meets a mysterious man. His name is Lorne Malvo (Billy Bob Thornton) and he tells Lester to stand up for himself. But what Lester doesn’t know is, that when he follows his advice, his life will change forever. While Lester’s life is drastically changing, deputy Molly Solverson (Allison Tolman) is working on the case of a possible car accident. In that accident one person has died, but he wasn’t the driver. Molly connects Lester to Lorne and no one takes her seriously.
“Fargo” is based on the movie with the same name, from 1996, which was directed by the Coen brothers. The movie was nominated for seven Oscars and won two of them. The film is one of my favorites. If the TV show could keep the same atmosphere and feel as the film, I was going to love it. The Coen brothers were executive producers on this project. The TV show is amazing!
Billy Bob Thornton is brilliant! His humor is just genius, so dark yet hard not to laugh. His role doesn’t make “Fargo” just a crime drama, he adds comedy as well. And so does Martin Freeman. His character kind of reminds me of William H. Macy’s performance in the movie version. Freeman does such a fantastic job as someone who never did anything noteworthy and now is living in a nest full of lies. Created by himself. And he gets more and more creative with it. I also loved Allison Tolman, who played my favorite character on the show. It’s hard to dislike her, just like Marge Gunderson in “Fargo” the film. Molly is so determined to find the right person, even when no one believes her. And then there is Colin Hanks, who plays Gus. A cop that actually always dreamed of being a mailman. He is not very good at his cop job, but he is so loveable and sweet.
The setting of the show is beautiful, all the snowy landscapes. This also adds to the mystery of the entire show.
Some people complained about the ending of the show. I think it was good, especially Lester’s part of the story.
“Fargo” was even better than I initially expected. I’m ready to watch season 2 as well, even though it has a complete different cast.

zondag 27 juli 2014

100 Movie Challenge 2014 - # 87: Nebraska

Director: Alexander Payne
Genre: Comedy/ Drama
Runtime: 115 minutes
Year: 2013
Starring: Bruce Dern, Will Forte, June Squibb, Bob Odenkirk, Stacey Keach

Description: Woody (Bruce Dern) is an aging, booze-addled father who makes the trip from Montana to Nebraska with his estranged son David (Will Forte) in order to claim a million-dollar Mega Sweepstakes Marketing prize.

Review: We go on another trip with director Alexander Payne. This time we travel to Lincoln, Nebraska, where the elderly Woody thinks a million dollars is waiting for him. After getting a letter, he seriously thinks he has won a million dollars. Woody is determined to get that money and because no one can change his mind, his son David takes him there. On the way there, they make a stop in Hawthorne, where Woody’s family lives.
This film fits Payne’s oeuvre perfectly. Humor and melancholy alternate. Father and son grow closer during the road trip together. Although the movie shows some similarities with Payne’s previous film “Sideways”, “About Schmidt” and “The Descendants”, it dares to be different because it was filmed in black and white. This gives the film a timeless quality.
The acting is fantastic. Bruce Dern really carries the film as Woody. That Oscar nomination should have been a win. And Will Forte, who is mostly known for little roles in silly comedies, really surprised. His performance is vulnerable and touching. And June Squibb, as Woody’s wife Kate, is hilarious.
Alexander Payne managed to make another great movie, it’s moving and full of heart.

Rating: 4,5/ 5