Director: Patrick Hughes
Genre: Action/
Comedy/ Crime
Runtime: 117
minutes
Year:
2021
Starring: Ryan Reynolds,
Samuel L. Jackson, Salma Hayek, Morgan Freeman, Antonio Banderas
Description: The bodyguard
Michael Bruce (Ryan Reynolds) continues his friendship with assassin Darius
Kincaid (Samuel L. Jackson) as they try to save Darius’ wife Sonia (Salma
Hayek).
Review: As much as I liked “The Hitman’s Bodyguard”, it didn’t exactly scream
for a sequel. On the other hand, buddy action comedies are extremely rare these
days (gosh, I miss those 80s and 90s buddy cop movies), so if capitalizing on
this mild success is the only way to keep this type somewhat alive: so be it. “The
Hitman’s Bodyguard” still had a solid trump card that wasn’t fully played:
Salma Hayek as the scene-stealing wife of the titular hitman. So it makes sense
that her supporting role has been upgraded to one of the three leads and she
has been given a prominent place not only on the poster, but even in the title.
This time, bodyguard Michael
Bryce not only gets stuck with hitman Darius Kincaid, but also with his equally
disturbed wife Sonia. This development manages to shake p the dynamic quite a
bit. Where Bryce and Kincaid were still equivalent opposites in the first part,
this time Bryce is in the minority. He is at the mercy of a couple who behave
like children, but treat him as is he were their child. Of course, the coarse -tongued
Sonia gets all the attention, to which actress Salma Hayek gives herself over
with visible pleasure. Fortunately, the bond between Bryce and Kincaid is not
completely forgotten. And while the events of the first film may have created
some mutual respect between the two, it by no means mean that they are friends
now.
Whereas the first part was
set in Western Europe, part two is set in the Mediterranean territory, playing
on the tension between Greece and the European Union. Now I’m sure that
relationship is still no optimal, but this plot point would have been a lot
more topical ten years ago.
“Hitman’s Wife’s Bodyguard” is
flat, nonsensical and lacks the straightforwardness of its predecessor. It’s a
fairly easy fill-in-the-blanks exercise that hardly deviates from what made the
first part so successful. And yet, again, there isn’t too much to dislike. The actors
have fine chemistry, there are some solidly executed chases, and while not
every joke hits the mark, there are plenty that will make you laugh. In other
times, a film like this would probably have been casually tossed aside as a
pointless interlude, but in a time when lavish blockbusters rule the roost,
this kind of unpretentious entertainment may deserve a little more benefit of
the doubt.
Rating: 3,5/
5
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten